Matters Arising

Supreme Court Annuls Gyakye Quayson’s Election

2 Mins read

Supreme Court Annuls Gyakye Quayson’s Election.

The Supreme Court has in a unanimous decision declared the election of James Gyakye Quayson as Member of Parliament for Assin North as null, void and unconstitutional.

The panel of seven presided over by Justice Jones Dotse, said the election of James Quayson when he owed allegiance to a country other than Ghana is “inconsistent with and violates Article 94(2) (a) of the Constitution of the Republic o Ghana 1992.”

The court orders Parliament to expunge his name as MP from the records of Parliament.

Justice Jones Victor Dotse, Justice Nene Amegatcher, Justice Mariama Owusu, Gertrude Araba Torkornoo, Justice Prof. Henrietta Mensa-Bonsu, Justice Yonny Kulendi and Justice Barbara Ackah-Yensu declared that Mr Quayson was  not qualified at the time he contested the election 2020.

According to EIB Network’s Legal Affairs Correspondent, all relief sought by the plaintiff were granted and the full reasons of the panel would be ready on June 7.

Background

The application under consideration is anchored on a writ which the Applicant caused to be issued on the 24th of January, 2022, invoking the original jurisdiction of this Court for the following reliefs:

1. “A Declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 94(2)(a) of the Constitution, 1992 of the Republic of Ghana at the time of filing his nomination form between 5 – 9th October 2020 to contest the 2020 Parliamentary elections for the Assin North Constituency the Ist defendant was not qualified as a member of Parliament.

2. A Declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 94(2)(a) of the Constitution, 1992 of the Republic of Ghana the decision of the 2nd Defendant to permit the 1st Defendant to contest Parliamentary Elections in the Assin North Constituency when the 3rd Defendant owed allegiance to a country other than Ghana is inconsistent with and violates Article 94(2) (a) of the Constitution of the Republic o Ghana 1992.

See also  Putin's Surprising Statement: Preferring Joe Biden Over Donald Trump for the White House

3. A Declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 94(2) (a) of Defendant as Member of Parliament for the Assin North Constituency was unconstitutional.

4. A Declaration that upon a true and proper interpretation of Article 94(2) (a) of the constitution, 1992 of the Republic of Ghana the swearing in of 1st Defendant as Member of Parliament for the Assin North Constituency was unconstitutional, null and void and of no legal effect.

5. Any further Orders and / or Directions as the Court may deem fit to give effect or enable effect to be given to the Orders of the court.

 

Source: Starrfm.com.gh

Related posts
AmericaAsiaBusinessChinaGlobal 360Matters Arising

Report Shows 4.3% YoY Decline in US Exports to China in 2023 Amid Trade Turmoil

2 Mins read
Report Shows 4.3% YoY Decline in US Exports to China in 2023 Amid Trade Turmoil Led by a decline in agricultural goods and semiconductor shipments, the…
Matters Arising

KPMG Takes Bold Step in Crime Reduction by Hiring Former Prisoners

1 Mins read
KPMG Takes Bold Step in Crime Reduction by Hiring Former Prisoners One of Britain’s Big Four accountancy firms is hiring former prisoners…
Matters ArisingTechnology

Microsoft Bars Employee Access to Perplexity AI, Impacting Azure OpenAI's Major Customers

1 Mins read
Microsoft Bars Employee Access to Perplexity AI, Impacting Azure OpenAI’s Major Customers Microsoft is blocking employee access to Perplexity AI, one of the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *